Given the virtual lack of royal males who were old enough to rule, disarray over who would assume the throne after Akhenaten’s death seems to have plagued the Amarna family. Having accorded exceptional status to the women in his life, the Heretic had probably paved the way for one of them to assume control of Egypt in the years ahead. Did Nefertiti enjoy a period of co-regency with her husband; and did she later marry her eldest daughter symbolically to become sole pharaoh, before passing the throne onto her? Almost any of these scenarios could have been possible.
A fragment of a limestone column from the Great Palace at Amarna shows Nefertiti and her eldest daughter Meritaten adoring the Aten. The Queen wears the twin feathers of Shu and the ram’s horns upon her head. It is possible that Meritaten followed in her mother’s footsteps to become pharaoh. Ashmolean Museum, Oxford.
Did Meritaten Contact the Hittites?
An Amarna queen wrote a desperate letter to the Hittite king, Suppiluliuma I, requesting him to send a prince for her to marry – with the assurance that he would be king of Egypt. An incredible offer, but one that gave rise to much suspicion in the mind of the recipient. In the document, the scared widow – who was obviously being pressurized to wed soon – expressed disdain at the thought of marrying a ’servant’ – someone of lowly station than herself. But who was this ‘servant’ Dakhamunzu feared so greatly? Writing about the episode (known popularly as the Zannanza Affair), Jared Miller avers: “‘Servant’ is likely used in a disparaging manner, rather than literally, and probably with reference to real person(s) who indeed were being put forth as candidates.” Miller also offers the prominence of sun deities with the Hittite king as a motivating factor in the queen preferring a Hittite prince over a Babylonian.
- The Military Campaigns of Tiglath-Pileser III: Priest King and Conqueror – Part 1
- The Silence of Akhenaten: Was the Pharaoh Mute, Blind or Cultic?
- Legendary Riches: Commercial Gains, Trade and Tragedy During the Reign of King Solomon
A leading votary, French Egyptologist Dr Marc Gabolde’s theory about Meritaten being Dakhamunzu holds that she was elevated to the status of Akhenaten’s coregent in his final years; and her ploy to get the Hittite king to dispatch a son succeeded. Therefore, Prince Zannanza traveled to Egypt married her and claimed the throne. He then adopted an Egyptianized name Smenkhkare. But, following his untimely death, Meritaten assumed full pharaonic prerogatives to continue reigning as King Ankhkheperure Neferneferuaten.
Plaster face-study identified as King Smenkhkare. Neues Museum, Berlin. (Inset) A terracotta mold with the throne name of this ephemeral ruler. Los Angeles County Museum of Art.
Gabolde’s theory is not far-fetched because records left by Manetho, an Egyptian priest who lived during the Ptolemaic era, states that a king of the late Eighteenth Dynasty was succeeded by: “his daughter Akenkheres”. If true, the evidence favors Meritaten more than Nefertiti. “The chief difficulty with Meritaten’s candidacy is the fact that her cartouche appears with the title Hmt-nswt wrt ‘Chief Queen’ in conjunction with those of both the coregent Neferneferuaten and Smenkhkare (in the latter instance also with their figures). The first juxtaposition seems clearly to identify Meritaten and Neferneferuaten as two different individuals, while the second would involve an unprecedented - and for the Egyptians, perhaps unthinkable – ‘demotion’ of a pharaoh if Meritaten had indeed served as Akhenaten’s coregent,” explains Dr James Allen. But this alone can in no way decide Meritaten’s co-regency with Akhenaten, since her name is never combined with the prenomen Ankhkheperure.